The role of art and rebellion in a repressed society.

Published by

on

“Cancel culture,” the phenomenon of public shaming and boycotting individuals for perceived offences, has become a potent force in the digital age. While it can hold powerful figures accountable, it also raises complex psychological and ethical questions. The speed and anonymity of the internet can amplify outrage, leading to rapid, widespread condemnation, often without due process or a clear path to redemption. The fear of being “cancelled” can stifle free speech and open debate, as individuals become hesitant to express controversial opinions. From a psychological perspective, it taps into tribal instincts and the desire for social cohesion, but it also risks fostering a culture of unforgiveness and moral absolutism. What are your thoughts on “cancel culture”: is it a necessary tool for justice or a dangerous form of online vigilantism?

Leave a comment