Personalised medicine, tailored to an individual’s unique genetic makeup, promises revolutionary advancements in treating diseases and preventing illness. This includes the potential for genetic “correction” – altering genes to eliminate predispositions to illness or even enhance certain traits. While the prospect of eradicating debilitating diseases is incredibly compelling, the ethical implications are vast. Who decides which genes are “corrected” and which are left alone? Could it lead to a slippery slope of selecting for “desirable” traits beyond medical necessity, exacerbating social inequalities? Ensuring equitable access and preventing the creation of a “genetic divide” will be paramount as this technology evolves. If genetic “correction” were safe and available, what ethical lines should not be crossed?
What are the limits of human adaptation to technology?
Published by
on
Antony West (Author) 
Leave a comment